IOF
International Osteoporosis Foundation
International Osteoporosis Foundation
  • Main menu
  • Home
  • About usOpen submenu
  • What we doOpen submenu
  • Educational hub
  • Thematic menu
  • PatientsOpen submenu
  • Health ProfessionalsOpen submenu
  • Policy MakersOpen submenu
  • Our NetworkOpen submenu
  • IOF Platforms
  • Capture the Fracture®
  • World Osteoporosis Day
  • Fundamentals of Osteoporosis Course
  • Latin America
  • IOF Academy
  • Build Better Bones
Close submenuAbout us
  • About IOF
  • The Board
  • The Executive Committee
  • Regional Representation
  • The Committees
  • The Staff
  • Annual Report
  • Contact us
  • Logo & Brand Guidelines
  • IOF position on conflict zone-collaborations
Close submenuWhat we do
  • Science & ResearchOpen submenu
  • Policy & AdvocacyOpen submenu
  • Meetings & Events
  • Education
Close submenuScience & Research
  • Latest News
  • Capture the Fracture®
  • IOF Academy
  • Latest Projects
  • Working Groups
  • Journals
  • Awards
  • WHO ESCEO Agreement
Close submenuPolicy & Advocacy
  • Latest News
  • World Osteoporosis Day
  • IOF Global Patient Charter
  • Improve your knowledge
  • IOF Compendium of Osteoporosis
  • WHO ESCEO Agreement
Close submenuPatients
  • Patients Homepage
  • IOF Osteoporosis Risk Check
  • About Osteoporosis
  • Prevention
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
  • Patient resources
  • Bone Healthy Recipes
  • Facts & Statistics
  • World Osteoporosis Day
  • Patient Stories
  • Find your National Society
  • IOF Global Patient Charter
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter
Close submenuHealth Professionals
  • Health Professionals Homepage
  • Latest News
  • OsteoporosisOpen submenu
  • Fragility FracturesOpen submenu
  • Facts & Statistics
  • Capture the Fracture®
  • Fundamentals of Osteoporosis Course
  • Meetings & Events
  • CSA Working Groups
  • Articles & Position Papers
  • Educational Materials
  • Research Tools
  • Patient Resources
  • Journals
  • Skeletal Rare Disorders
  • Osteoporosis and Covid-19
Close submenuOsteoporosis
  • About Osteoporosis
  • Prevention
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
Close submenuFragility Fractures
  • About
  • Epidemiology
  • Vertebral Fractures
  • Treatment & Surgery
  • Models of Care
  • Falls Prevention
Close submenuPolicy Makers
  • Policy Makers Homepage
  • Burden of Osteoporosis
  • Facts & Statistics
  • Fracture Liaison Services (FLS)
  • IOF Global Patient Charter
  • Policy Reports & Audits
  • IOF Alliances
  • World Osteoporosis Day
  • Patient Stories
Close submenuOur Network
  • Our Network Homepage
  • The Committees
  • Fracture Liaison Services (FLS)
  • Latest News
  • IOF Alliances
  • Corporate Partners
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • IOF Universities Network

LOGIN

Sign up for free
Forgot your password?
IOF Cookie Policy -IOF Privacy policy
Skip to main content
IOF International Osteoporosis Foundation
  1. Home
  2. Health professionals
  3. Fragility fractures
  4. Treatment & Surgery
Join us !

Social menu

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Donate
Share
  1. Home
  2. Health professionals
  3. Fragility fractures
  4. Treatment & Surgery
  • About
  • Epidemiology
  • Vertebral Fractures
  • Falls prevention
  • Treatment & Surgery
  • Models of care

Treatment & Surgery

Treatment of fragility fractures can be surgical or non-surgical and usually falls to orthopaedic surgeons. Importantly, models of care exist for secondary fracture prevention to maximise the likelihood that the first fracture will also be the last. 

Hip fractures

In the management of hip fractures, surgical treatment is considered as a first choice to hopefully reduce complications [1]Cannada, L.K. and B.W. Hill, Osteoporotic Hip and Spine Fractures: A Current Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2014. 5(4): p. 207-12.

, as well as try to give mobility back to patients. Surgical management usually comprises of pre-, intra- and post-operative stages. 

Even though the risk of severe complications due to immobilisation and therefore death is high with non-surgical management, this option can be selected when patients have severe co-morbidities that mean surgery is contraindicated. 

Overall, the long-term prognosis and risk versus benefits of surgery should be the subject of discussion between the orthopaedic surgeon and the patient (including his/her relatives, as hip fractures cause decreased mobility and independence).

Vertebral fractures

Management of vertebral fractures if diagnosed includes surgery and non-pharmacological approaches. Currently in the standards of care to treat pain from vertebral fractures, despite the absence of consensus with respect to its long-term efficacy and safety, is vertebral augmentation surgery by percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty [1]Cannada, L.K. and B.W. Hill, Osteoporotic Hip and Spine Fractures: A Current Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2014. 5(4): p. 207-12.

. Non-pharmacological approaches include orthoses/bracing and exercise.

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are minimally invasive surgical procedures which aim to relieve symptoms associated with vertebral compression fractures.

With vertebroplasty a needle is inserted into the compressed portion of a vertebra and surgical cement is injected to provide immediate pain relief through stabilization of the vertebral fracture. Prior to the injection of cement, inflatable bone plugs can be used to create a gap between the vertebra. In this case the technique is known as balloon vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. The objective of this latter method is not only to stabilize the vertebra but also to restore the normal anatomy of the fractured vertebra and to reduce the curvature of the spine in the injured region.

As radiological control is necessary to guide the physician during the operation, it is recommended that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures be performed in a hospital setting and under sterile conditions. Both methods can be performed under local or general anaesthesia.

Although these procedures may improve quality of life for some patients, it is important to note that side effects such as cement leakage, pulmonary oedema, myocardial infarction and rib fractures have been described after both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Furthermore, the problem of an increased incidence of new fractures in the adjacent vertebra, after such treatments has been raised in clinical trials.

Other fracture sites

These include any other site except the hip, spine and forearm; for example, the proximal humerus, ribs, tibia etc. These fractures, just like the traditional fracture sites at the hip, spine and forearm, cause immobilisation, pain and leads to significant morbidity. Again, treatment options are surgical or non-surgical and the decision will depend on the surgeon, patient factors and fracture patterns among others.

Management of Atypical Femur Fractures (AFF)

Treating AFF with surgery is recommended to ensure proper bone union and to give patients the best chance of recovery. Read more about atypical femur fractures.

Post-fracture rehabilitation and exercise

After a first fracture, fall prevention by exercises is crucial to avoid sustaining any additional fractures. Exercises can also provide pain relief. 
To maintain bone mass, as well as muscle strength and mass, resistance exercises and balance training are recommended especially for elderly adults (e.g. tai-chi). If these patients have other disabilities and/or physical dysfunctions, assessment by a physical or occupational therapist may help in considering appropriate assistance devices. 

Hip fracture patients

It is known that hip fractures cause patients to be immobile. However, after surgery patients should be mobilised as early as possible and post-operative, inpatient and after hospital discharge exercises are just as important to maximise functional recovery. Methods to prevent falls should be implemented and exercises that strengthen hip muscles and to avoid atrophy of notably the quadriceps should be prescribed by a therapist. 
Post-fracture rehabilitation and exercise are key so that the patient can regain as much independence as possible, but also to avoid complications due to long bed rest periods. For example, exercises like ankle move can help in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis caused by immobilisation. 

Studies have shown that intensive exercise training can lead to improvements in strength and function in elderly patients who have had hip replacement surgery [2]Hauer, K., et al., Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age Ageing, 2002. 31(1): p. 49-57.

. Patients who received the exercise therapy were significantly better at a variety of daily living fundamentals, such as getting up, walking, climbing stairs and maintaining posture. For example, they walked on average 50% faster and climbed stairs about 30% faster than patients who did not receive the exercise regimen. Emotionally, patients who had received the exercise therapy were less distressed by their overall condition than patients who did not, although both groups of patients were equally as fearful of falling [2]Hauer, K., et al., Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age Ageing, 2002. 31(1): p. 49-57.

.

Vertebral fracture patients

As with hip fractures, in order to regain as much independence as possible, early mobilisation, potentially with a vertebral corset (back brace), is usually indicated. Fall prevention, maintaining overall musculature and back muscle exercises are recommended for these patients to avoid a second fracture. However, exercises should be prescribed by a therapist and caution is required to avoid injury.

Forearm fracture patients

In this case it is important that these individuals maintain their physical function with exercises to prevent falls and any additional fractures.

Physical activity in patients with osteoporosis

A review of the potential side effects and limitations of physical activity in osteoporotic patients with or without a previous fracture is outlined in the table below [3]Chilibeck, P.D., et al., Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity: arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2011. 36 Suppl 1: p. S49-79.

.

Patient

Physical Activity

Level of Evidence*

Recommendation Grades**

At high risk of fracture (with prevalent fracture or with glucocorticoid therapy)

Avoid trunk flexion exercise, as this may increase spine fracture risk; however, trunk extension exercise and abdominal stabilization exercise are safe.

Level 2

Grade A

Recovering from hip fracture

Physical therapy exercises should not be performed for more than 15–30 min per session early in the rehabilitation process, as this increases the risk of orthopaedic complications. 
Weight-bearing exercises are recommended from day 18.
Higher-intensity exercises, such as resistance training can be progressively implemented 1 month following in-patient rehabilitation.

Level 2

Grade A

With osteoporosis

Aerobic physical activity and progressive resistance training are safe. Intensity of the exercise sessions should initially be light to moderate and progressively increased based on the individual’s capability.

Level 2

Grade A

With osteoporosis

They should avoid powerful twisting movements of the trunk.

Level 3

Grade C

With spinal cord injury and osteoporosis of the lower limbs

Avoid maximal strength testing with electrical stimulation of the lower limbs.

Level 3

Grade C

With spinal cord injury, without recent fracture Progressive lower limb resistance training, cycling and ambulation (all assisted by electrical stimulation) or body-weight-supported treadmill. Level 2 Grade A
*Level of evidence: 1, RCTs; 2, RCTs with limitation or very convincing observational studies; 3, observational studies; 4, anecdotal evidence.
**Recommendation grades: A, strong; B, intermediate; C, weak.
Adapted from Chilibeck et al., Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2011 [1]Cannada, L.K. and B.W. Hill, Osteoporotic Hip and Spine Fractures: A Current Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2014. 5(4): p. 207-12.

. 

REFERENCES

1.

Cannada, L.K. and B.W. Hill, Osteoporotic Hip and Spine Fractures: A Current Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2014. 5(4): p. 207-12.

2.

Hauer, K., et al., Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age Ageing, 2002. 31(1): p. 49-57.

3.

Chilibeck, P.D., et al., Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity: arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2011. 36 Suppl 1: p. S49-79.

9, rue Juste-Olivier
CH-1260 Nyon - Switzerland
+41 22 994 0100
info@osteoporosis.foundation
Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© 2025 International Osteoporosis Foundation
Cookie Policy - Privacy policy
 
Close menu